![kodak c 41 kodak c 41](https://www.njuskalo.hr/image-w920x690/fotooprema/kodak-professional-pro-image-100-35mm-36exp-color-negative-film-c-41-slika-128005773.jpg)
*These emulations are very accurate and come from RNI. Straight photo to straight photo with emulation.Ĭanon 6D, 35mm F2 YongNuo lens ($90 on Amazon) The only thing I did to the image was apply the film emulsion emulation – there is no sharpening, or color correction, or dodge/burn… nothing.
KODAK C 41 PROFESSIONAL
Nothing has been done to it, just a straight conversion and over to this page.īelow is the same image as if it had been shot by these various C-41 films. Globally, 70-80 of photography students are women yet they account for only 13-15 of professional photographers. The shot on the right is the export of the RAW image. The photo on the right is one of my favorite portraits.īriana and I were out making photos (something we do whenever we can) and I noticed the stick above in sharp focus with her below in exquisite dappled light. Other outlets may stock additional emulsions, but I wanted to keep it easy. These are the films you can buy today from Amazon. This sample of film stock was taken from the Amazon inventory.
![kodak c 41 kodak c 41](https://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/items/Kodak_8320608_Flexicolor_C_41_Developer_Replenisher_27588.jpg)
These are emulations*, not scans, so they may not be perfect but are very close to the film stock and normal processing. That said, if ECN2 processed film is exposed carefully at EI125, the results can be very good if you like softer colours.Īll images were shot on an M6 with 35mm and 50mm lenses.THE VARIOUS COLOR NEGATIVE FILMS AND WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE
KODAK C 41 FULL
It allows the full EI250 speed and good tolerance for incorrect exposures, it also gave colours that I find more pleasing. The grain is very fine and the film has high definition. The C41 processed film has more contrast but with no detrimental effect and colours are natural. The two photos of the children were exposed at EI400, the canal and van at EI250. The underexposed images shot look no different from those at EI250. The films also tolerates under and overexposure much better than ECN2. The film tolerates overexposure well, it has a lower contrast and the colour palette is more muted compared to C41 processing. Silbersalz35 in Germany, who are offering a new ECN2 processing service, state that the Vision 3 films should be shot at half the advertised speed. The cathedral interior and person in the train images are very grainy, yet the robot and boat, exposed at EI125 exhibit fine grain. It became apparent that the speed of EI250 was too high for the film, it does not like underexposure in ECN2. The C41 lab was Exposure Film Lab, the ECN2 lab was Silverpan Film Lab. Brand: Kodak Item must be returned within: 30 Days Type: Final Rinse Restocking Fee: No Compatible with Film Type: C-41 Final Rinse Features: c41. Once the Remjet is off the film, normal machine processing can proceed. They are supplied in all-liquid concentrates for easy mixing, and designed for optimum results in many types of processors. After soaking the backing sloughs off the film into a sticky mess. KODAK FLEXICOLOR Chemicals, Process C-41, are for processing all KODAK Color Negative Films such as KODAK GOLD Films, KODAK ULTRA MAX Films, KODAK PROFESSIONAL PORTRA Films, as well as and other manufacturers' films. The backing must be removed in a pre-soak bath of baking soda or ECN2 pre-soak chemical. For example, C-41 developer replenisher is intended for replenishing exhausted developer. But replenisher are used to replenish exhausted working chemicals. Without the word replenisher they can be used immediately without adding anything.
![kodak c 41 kodak c 41](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/FD8AAOSw6Ftec~Bu/s-l300.jpg)
KODAK C 41 MOVIE
Remjet is a very heavy duty anti-halation backing applied to the movie film to help with the friction caused by the film moving at high speed through a movie camera. Kodak C-41 developer, bleach, fixer and stablizer (or final rinse) all have replenishers. Please note that movie films must go to a lab that can handle Remjet backed films, most labs will refuse, or you can easily process it yourself.
![kodak c 41 kodak c 41](https://camerax.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/270-03167-768x768.jpg)
The scans from both labs had a mild red cast, which could only be removed by slightly adjusting the red curve using Photoshop. All the rolls were mostly exposed at box speed for shadow detail at EI250, but I also over and underexposed some negs. The films were processed at two different UK labs, one roll was put through ECN2, the others C41, then high res scanned. The cost of the cassettes was nearly half that of Kodak Portra films, my usual colour neg choice, a handy saving. Perhaps the Kodak Vision 3 250D 35mm movie film would be equally as good? I bought some 35mm cassettes that had been loaded from a bulk roll for a trial. The results were very promising, fine grain, nice colours but the halation on highlights was a problem for me. Exposed at EI800 with an 85B filter for exteriors and processed in C41. A little while ago I tried some 35mm Cinestill 800 colour negative, which is Kodak Vision 3 500 Tungsten movie film with the Remjet anti-halation backing removed.